DRI Analytical System
US-PDP DRI
Switch to UK-FSA Data
Methodology
By Food
By Pesticide
Conventional vs. Organic
Domestic vs. Imported
Individual Samples
Aggregate Sample DRI
Aggregate Dietary Risk Index of Across All Pesticides by Food
Select Data Parameters
Select Food:
Apples
Apples
Select Origin:
Combined Imports
Combined Imports
Select Claim:
All Market Claims
All Market Claims
Select Year:
2016
2016
Method Details:
Acronyms and Glossary
The DRI Analytical System
Levels of Aggregation
Methodology and Data Sources
Technical Issues and Challenges
Results
Table 1: Pesticide Residue and Risk Indicators in Apples Ranked by Percent of Aggregate FS-DRI: All Market Claims, Combined Imports Tested by US-PDP in 2016
Number of Samples
Dietary Risk Indicators
Analyte
Total
Number of Positives
Percent Positive
Mean Residue (ppm)
cRfC (ppm)
DRI-M
FS-DRI
Percent of Aggregate FS-DRI
🔽
Output Options:Â
csv
Key Findings
loading accounts for NaN% of total FS-DRI risk across all pesticides detected.
The top three active ingredients accounts for NaN% of total, aggregate FS-DRI risk.
Residues of 0 pesticides account for less than 1% of total, aggregate FS-DRI risk.
The highest mean residue level reported was NaN ppm of loading. Residues of loading were found in 0.0% of samples tested.
Table 2: Calculation of the Chronic Reference Concentration (cRfC) by Pesticide, Active Ingredient for Combined Imports Apples, 2016, Tested by US-PDP
Analyte
🔼
NOAEL (mg/kg/day)
Standard Safety Factor
FQPA Safety Factor
cRfD or cPAD (mg/kg/day)
cRfC (ppm)
Output Options:Â
csv